Task 1

内容回忆

Some people believe that using educational game in group will benefit for student to study，others think it will disturb students and cause low efficiency，which one would you agree？

参考答案

Personally speaking, I believe that games could be beneficial for student ’ s academic performance. With the help of games, the class would be full of fun, which will motivate students to finish study works willingly. For example, my favorite teacher is my English teacher Kathy. I like her because her class is full of interesting games. I mean she always tells jokes, arranges games or asks us to form groups to do some group discussion or presentations. So I could get actively involved in the class and learn better. But other teacher’ s classes are a little bit boring: some of them will do all the talking in the class and some of them just show us slides and ask us to write everything down. As a result, I will get distracted and even fall asleep in these classes.

Task 2

阅读

学校给 business 专业的学生组织一个比赛，女生觉得好处是会给钱，这样学生有一笔钱可以作为启动资金；第二个好处是给学分，节省时间 focus on 自己的 idea 学生建议 more space in computer room by removing some computers，因为 computer room 不挤总会有很多空位。

听力

但是听力男生反对，因为已经有足够空间放一两本书了，你也不能一次性读很多资料，二是他认为女孩肯定是早上去的电脑室，那时候很多人都在教室所以很空但是晚上去就很挤，有时候还要排队，所以不能remove。

Task3

阅读

old adult 对他们 teen 和 20 多岁的事情会记得更清楚，实验是给一些人展示一些日常事物的 word，然后让他们讲与其相关的故事。

听力

例子是一个女士的提示词是猫，然后她讲了她养的猫，尽管长大以后她又养了很多只，但是印象深刻的是首只。

Task4

话题

1.主题：birds 怎么调整他们的 position 来维持stay up in the strong wind 和 straight fly。

分论 1: 调整 wings，例子是 ego 会把他们的羽翼贴紧身体，从而维持重心。

分论 2: 让尾巴跟着风摇摆，从而能够站稳。

【写作部分】

综合点评

这次托福考试写作部分整体难度适中，独立写作都是重复之前的考题。  其中，综合写作考查动物类，整体难度适中，生僻词汇较少。

独立写作考查生活类话题，难度适中，重复 2019/11/9 考题，学生在备考过程中有关此类话题基本都会涉及这一题。

综合写作

话题分类：生物类

考题回忆：总论点

防止 Asian carp 侵入 Great Lakes 的三种方案。

• 阅读部分

分论点一：可以修墙用于阻隔鱼从周围的河流进入到湖区。

分论点二：利用电装置， 使得鱼会被电死。

分论点三：采取两个步骤,首先通过有毒的化学原料把所有的鱼毒死,然后再引入本土的物种。.

• 听力部分

分论点一：会妨碍周围工厂运输货物，不利于航运，江边的工业将会受到  不良的影响， 迁移建设会耗费很多钱；

分论点二：这样无法覆盖全部范围内的鱼， carp 可以游到其它地方， 然后进入到湖里面。

分论点三：这种做法非常的危险，产生的后果难以预料，而且毒药会导致  生态系统破坏， 不利于鱼类生长。

解题思路：阅读和听力之间构成相反的关系，且听力按照每个分论点两个层次来处理较好，听力尽可能写的详细些。

参考范文

Both the reading and the listening discuss about the invasion of Asian carp into the rivers leading to the Great Lakes. The reading raises three possible ways to deal with it, while the listening contends that they are not feasible .

First, as the reading suggests, the walls can be built to prevent the fish from coming into the Great Lakes. However, the listening points out that the walls will affect shipping on the rivers because the goods from surrounding factories should be unloaded before being reloaded onto another ship. Moreover, with the industries along the rivers harmed, the shifting construction will increase related expense.

Second, the reading mentions that the electrical charged device can be used to eliminate Asian carp. The listening, on the other hand, argues that the reach of the rivers is really wide, so some fish can escape from electrocution. Besides, still some others can pass through the device for reproduction.

Third, the author further illustrates that the use of certain toxic chemicals, together with the reintroduction of native species to the rivers, can be advocated. However, the lecturer holds that this method is tried in small bodies of water, which is hazardous and hard to predict possible results. What is worse, the whole ecosystem would be negatively impacted, which is harmful to the growth of fish species.

独立写作

话题分类 生活类（重复 2019/11/9）

考题回忆

Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer?

解题思路

• 写作思路：

要点：属于生活类话题，选择类的作文，对于看电影来说是先看书然后去看电影好还是反过  来， 根据自己情况选择自己喜欢好写的面就成。

观点：选择先看书然后去看电影好

让步段：不看书籍去电影只能一定程度上了解欣赏电影。

正方分论点 1.（ 转折） 然而有些经典的根据书来拍摄的电影要先看书籍然后看更好。

正方分论点 2.先看书再看电影有利于评价和赏析电影好还是不好。

参考范文

Since the advent of movies, the general public have showcased a passionate interest in this form of entertainment. In the modern society, numerous films are adapted from books authored by some well-renowned writers. For the sake of a better cinematic understanding, the sequential order of watching the film versus reading the relevant book has created quite a stir in society. To my understanding, it is more desirable for people to read the original book before going to the theater.

It should be admitted that the audience can to some degree appreciate the movies without reading the book ahead of time. Today, with plenty of young people occupied with their work, watching flicks is a favorable way to wind down. The movies which are shot based on the books are at times hard to understand, but the viewers, due to advanced techniques of film making or lifelike 3-D effects, are still capable of latching on to the schematic plot line.

Nevertheless, in terms of some classic films, it is necessary for individuals to read books before seeing movies. The movies of this type, as a matter of fact, are often laden with complex twists and turns and profound meanings, which are difficult for the moviegoers to gain a deep understanding. If they can read the original story in advance such as “Wuthering Heights”, they can dig into the movie more profoundly and objectively, so that the subtle changes of feelings, facial expressions and character traits, which are often ignored by those without reading the very book， can be better sensed or felt in the movie theater. It is in the process of watching that viewers even can imagine themselves behaving like a certain leading or supporting actor, in that they have already known the story inside.

Additionally, perusing the book in advance makes the audience appropriately assess whether a movie is well produced. Armed with background knowledge from the book, the audience can better comprehend if the director has well captured the traits of some characters and mental activity. A certain blockbuster, for instance, if a person is not informed of the book-based contents, might leave him superficially thinking that the leading actor is impossibly handsome or head over heels in love with his lover. Nonetheless, an avid reader who has seen the film can find fault with the film making, suggesting that some parts of the movie defy logic and the descriptions presented in the book. The appraisals of a movie would vary from person to person, but we need to acknowledge that a well-prepared viewer---having read the corresponding book---can better weigh up the pros and cons of the movie.

To put it in a nutshell, despite rest and relaxation derived from watching movies without reading original books, the reading-based film watching, from my point of view, should be highly recommended. Objectively speaking, understanding and assessing a film deeply can add spice to our lives（482words）.

【阅读及听力部分】

获取PDF版本

点击咨询客服，回复“托福机经”

即可获取