上海环球教育
2016-07-01综合写作
要不要在小学音乐教育上投资。
Reading: 1. 浪费时间,效率没有花在阅读或者数学上高;
2. 浪费钱,有这个钱还不如给那些基本教学资源都不足的学校;
3. 没用,大多数学生都不会成为音乐,然后对于那些成为音乐的学生
来说,学校的这点设备也是不够的。
Listening: 从三个方面进行驳斥
1. 研究表明,学习音乐的学生对于数学和阅读的悟力强过没学过的;
2. 每个长不需要给自己的孩子单买乐器,节约了成本,而且学校的乐器可以用很久,根本不会浪费钱;
3. 研究表明,学过音乐的孩子以后这种对艺术的感觉不会消失,而且教育不能只着眼于现在,要考虑让学生度过充实而精彩的一生。
范文:
The lecture refutes the view mentioned in the reading with strong supporting evidences presented, aiming to further argue that it is essential for primary schools to invest on music.
Firstly, from the perspective of efficiency, the professor states his doubt, because according to the lecture, it explains that the students who have acquired music class have a better understanding as well as efficiency in reading and math.
Secondly, judging from cost, the professor holds a different view, because referring to the lecture, parents do not need to buy their children musical instrument individually, and on the contrary, the school will offer instrument and the instrument could be sustained for long.
Thirdly, on the point of practice meaning of music class, the professor never fails to express his concern, because in terms of the lecture, the sense of music will not decay with the time going, and this sense will ensure students a colorful life.
Therefore, our education should not limit the insight merely within the current effect.