名师解析

7月托福写作预测

上海环球教育

2016-07-01
7月托福考试预测
1
口语预测

综合写作

Reading:

一些公司对员工使用网络限制。

1. 对邮件进行过滤,这样就可不散布公司里面的机密;

2. 从流媒体的角度来看,限制访问一些娱乐网站,但会花费比较大;

3. 干脆完全停掉上网,禁止个人使用网络,说这样可以提高生产力。


Listening:

1. 过滤并没有很大的效果,那些想用邮件泄密的人,因为要是有员工真的想泄密的话,他们会倾向于用一些无关的词汇,过滤根本筛不出来的;

2. 根本不应该花费那么多钱堵死所有的媒体。事实表明,这种流媒体10%有用,90%都没用。教授说应该只对一些大常见的媒体网站,如流行音乐和视频截流就行了;

3. 实际上允许个人使用网络的公司更加有生产效率。因为员工被认为是受到信赖,他们就会有较好的道德,才会愿意去努力工作,并在这个公司服务更久。这样的话公司才能增加生产效率。


范文:

The lecture opposes the view mentioned in the reading with strong supporting evidences presented, aiming to further illustrate that the limit access to internet use is not as effective as stated.


Firstly, From the perspective of email filter, the professor states his doubt, because according to the lecture, the filter is not effective to those who maliciously expose secrets of the company, in the use of innocent words, which the filter cannot effectively screen out.


Moreover, judging from the streaming media, the professor holds a different view, as the lecture further illustrates that it is not necessary to spend that much blocking all the streaming media, only 10% of which is effective. According to data, the limit to the most common streaming media, such as websites of pop music and videos, is effective enough.


Last but not least, on the point of zero access to internet, the professor never fails to express his concern, because in terms of the listening, those staff in the company allowing free internet access are of better creation, as they believe they are trusted by the company, and will behave in better morality in return, working hard and longer in the company.





立写作

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today.

这道题属于今夕对比的题目,实际上就是把同一件事物分在放在现在和过去进行对比。

观点:反对

解释:过去会出现食品短缺或者营养缺失等问题,现在消费的食品虽然质量提高了,但是不一定更健康。

论点:1. 餐饮业快速发展,人们为了节省时间经常在外吃高热量低营养的快餐,营养并不均衡。

 2. 现代科技得到发展,科学为了在提高农作产量的同时又能降低成本,开发一些新的技术研制新品种的农作物,而这些农作物虽然高产低成本,却对人的身体不利,如:转基因食品。以前的科技发展水平不高,农耕是比较原始的,农作物基本都是春种秋收,自然生长的,纯天然绿色食物。


范文:

Back in the days, the world suffered from instances of food-related issues such as shortage, sanitation, and nutritional content. Today, with the numerous advances in related fields of technology, most if not all, of these problems are just a memory of the past. Many claim, in particular, that the foods we consume today are of a much higher quality, thereby making them healthier to eat. But is this certainly the case? I don't think so.


The last time I checked, there were lots of fast food chains sprawling in our cities and even in some suburban areas. In these places are common sights of obese children and other unhealthy-looking consumers. It does not stop here. The situation gets worse. Remember the time that the price of staple food like rice was sky-high because of limited supply? Well, that's not the case now. However, there were news reports showing that most of these food supplies, though plentiful, lack the necessary nutritional content. Certain varieties were even proven to be harmful instead. Does the term Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) ring a bell? In spite of our efforts to produce agricultural products with higher yield, the main concern seems to be this. Are we really eating healthier food now?


Food fuels us. Depending on the quality of food we eat, our resistance to sickness, fatigue, and overall wellbeing is determined. Then how come most people now easily get sick or die early? Yes, there are other factors to consider like air pollution and the likes. However, food forms the large proportion of our requirements for survival and daily accomplishment of our activities.


This being said, I firmly conclude that the foods we eat today are not as healthy compared to those in the past. Despite the advances of modern technology, certain by-products are inevitable. Thus, it is up to us to effectively filter what goes into our mouths lest we suffer from unhealthy foods' effects.

城市选择
A
B
C
D
F
G
H
J
K
L
M
N
P
Q
R
S
T
W
X
Y
Z
海外
首页 打电话 在线咨询 校区地址 关于我们