跨国公司的扩张以及由此带来的全球化的加剧对每个人都有利。同意反对？

这是一道观点类大作文，题目中出现了肯定词“everyone”，所以我们在写作时可以从反对的角度切入来写。另外要注意2个关键词，multinational companies 和 the resulting increase of globalization，在文中就话题展开时，必须要针对这两点都有呼应。

下面我们就看下跨国公司和全球化有哪些好处和坏处。

通过跨国公司和全球化贸易，各国的消费者能够购买到世界各地的商品，包括那些本土无法生产出的农作物和商品。同时，跨国公司可以利用全球化的产业链，将生产线放到劳动力更加便宜的地区，一方面带动了当地的就业，另一方面也可以让商品的生产成本更低，进而可以选择一个更低的定价获得竞争优势的同时让消费者获益，或者维持原定价产生更大的利润让投资者受益。

而坏处体现在跨国公司和全球化会对本土的品牌和生产者产生负面冲击。

因为跨国公司的生产规模优势带来的成本优势，使得他们能在与本土公司的竞争中采用更低的定价获得优势，进而使得本土公司失去市场，造成其难以发展甚至从业者失业。

本土产业的消亡可能会降低民众对自己本土文化的认同，进而不利于全球文化的多样性。而在诸如农业这样关系到国民生存的重要产业，失去本土生产能力依赖跨国企业的进口后，当有任何意外发生导致无法进口或者粮食价格过于高昂，就意味着国家无法让其民众正常生存进而引发危机。

其实，如果留意近两年国际新闻的同学，会听到一个词“逆全球化”，如果全球化是对每个人是有益的，那为什么会提出“逆全球化”呢？有兴趣可以去搜索下相关内容，会对大家有很大帮助。

The world is moving in a direction where the tentacles of cross-national corporations are reaching to all corners of the world. While this trend has been applauded by the devotees of globalization as a blessing for everyone, I will say it is a generalized opinion ignoring the discrete interests of individuals.

There seems to be reasons why the prosperity of multinational companies and the ensuing globalization is assumed beneficial to all. Those who think in this way may point to legions of advantages in daily life, whether these be job opportunities, equal accessibility to the same product from any corners of the world, or the easy to reach after sales service wherever they go. Examples regarding these including the international brands such as Dell, Apple and MacDonald, all of which play a key role in employment and their products are becoming an imperative part in lives of various demographics. Given this, here comes the assumption that the populace is the whole beneficiary of a globalized economy.

Plausible though it seems, it is difficult for me to see the veneration of a globalized business world as a blessing to all. Those who focus on its positive side of this trend are oblivious to the fact that the ramifications of any social episodes should be domain specific and context dependent. Based on this, the discussion can then move on to hand questions as to which social impacts are more desirable in the local context or what local stakeholders value more. From the perspective of local industries in developing countries, the relentless invasion of international brands may oust them from local market. To complicate mattes even more, the disappearance of indigenous artefacts may jeopardize the national identity and cultural diversity in the world.

From what has been discussed above, it is my opinion therefore, the benefits of a globalized economy dominated by multinational companies do not apply to everyone.

Applaud  支持  

Prosperity  成功

Demographic  群体  

Beneficiary  受益者

Indigenous  本土的

Artefacts  特色产品  

National identity  本土文化认同感

Jeopardize  损害